Logo

Home

Studio

Use Cases

Careers

Contact

Industry · Healthcare

Healthcare

From diagnosing breast cancer to predicting drug response — find out exactly where quantum and hybrid approaches can help solve your clinical challenges compared to existing solutions.

SUPERPOSITIONS  ▸  KIT
$ sp run --radiotherapy-planning.json
> classical baseline
DVH similarity············0.91
> hybrid (QAOA + VQE)
hybrid result············0.95
✓ constraints satisfied
CT volume · 7 beams · 18 OAR limits
TREATMENT PLANQSVM
Target
coverage
98%
OAR limit
OK
Dose (Gy)
70503010
MOLECULAR SIMVQE
ΔG
−8.7 kcal/mol
active space
128
BIOMARKER MODELHQNN
variant priority
cohort risk
F1 0.74n_train 200
Core Healthcare Use Cases

Where hybrid quantum algorithms show potential in healthcare

We don't promise universal "quantum supremacy." We target specific computationally hard problems where quantum components can offer better scaling, parameter efficiency, or resilience to data scarcity.

01

Medical Diagnostics & Classification

Tumor classificationClinical decision support
AlgorithmQSVM

Context

High-stakes binary and multiclass classification from clinical measurements — cell morphology, lab panels, imaging-derived features. Labeled datasets are small, expensive to produce, and constrained by privacy regulations. A few percentage points of diagnostic accuracy translate directly into lives and costs.

Quantum approach

Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) encodes patient features into quantum states and uses state-overlap as a kernel. The resulting Hilbert-space embedding captures complex feature interactions that classical kernels may miss — especially on small, high-dimensional clinical datasets.

QSVM · 0.98 AUCClassical · 0.96 AUCSensitivity1 − Specificity
02

Drug Response & Biomarker Prediction

Genomic featuresSmall samples
AlgorithmHQNN

Context

Predicting how a patient will respond to a specific treatment from genomic, proteomic, and clinical features. Datasets are high-dimensional and sparse — classical models overfit quickly, especially when the number of patients in a trial is limited.

Quantum approach

Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks (HQNN) combine a classical feature extractor with a variational quantum circuit. In validated cases, hybrid models maintain predictive quality even as the training set shrinks — the advantage over classical counterparts grows with data scarcity.

q0q1q2q3RxRxRxRxU(θ)U(θ)U(θ)U(θ)CLASSICALDENSEFEATURE MAPVARIATIONALHEAD
03

Molecular Simulation & Drug Discovery

Binding affinityMolecular properties
AlgorithmVQE

Context

Drug molecules and protein interactions are quantum-mechanical by nature. Simulating binding affinities, reaction pathways, and molecular properties at quantum-chemical accuracy scales exponentially on classical computers — limiting virtual screening throughput.

Quantum approach

Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and quantum chemistry methods model molecular-level physics directly on quantum hardware. No classical approximation shortcuts — the quantum computer speaks the language of the molecule.

E₀E (Ha)bond lengthMOLECULEVQE ENERGY
What's inside

A decision-ready report from every run

Every Studio run produces a research-paper-style PDF that includes:

  • Use case mapping and assumptions
  • Algorithm choice and rationale
  • Side-by-side benchmark quantum / hybrid vs your classical baseline
  • Metrics accuracy, AUC, F1, runtime, variance across seeds
  • Scaling outlook as hardware improves
A report format aligned with how clinical models are actually validated.
Download the sample report
SUPERPOSITIONS · STUDIORUN_058 · 5 OF 18
4. Benchmark
Convergence vs. classical SVM
ROC-AUC comparison
Variance across 30 seeds
Runtime · CPU vs simulator
Hardware scaling outlook
SUPERPOSITIONS · STUDIORUN_058 · MAR 2026
Diagnostics · QSVM
Breast cancer classification with Quantum Support Vector Machine
Authors · Superpositions Studio Research
Use case · binary classification of FNA-derived cell measurements (Wisconsin Breast Cancer, 569 samples, 30 features)
Qubits
6
Accuracy
96%
ROC-AUC
0.99
Abstract. We benchmark a Quantum Support Vector Machine pipeline against classical SVM baselines (linear and RBF kernels) for breast cancer diagnosis. The QSVM uses a parameter-free quantum feature map with PCA to 6 dimensions matching 6 qubits. On the held-out test set (n = 114), the QSVM achieves accuracy = 0.96 and ROC-AUC = 0.99, demonstrating clinically competitive performance…
doi:10.0000/sps-rep-0581 / 18

[Sample two-page PDF spread shown on larger screens]

The Workflow

What happens when you bring us a healthcare problem

Five structured steps that turn a clinical question into a research-grade benchmark — with code and a PDF you can actually use.

1
Use Case
2
Algorithm
3
Python Code
4
Solution
5
Comparison
STEP 01

Use Case

Describe your problem.

"Classify breast tumor samples as benign or malignant from FNA cell measurements." Quantum Assistant maps it to the right formulation.

YOUR INPUT
"Classify breast tumor samples as benign or malignant from 30 cell nucleus measurements."
ASSISTANT MAPPING
problem_type: binary classification
n_features: 30
encoding: PCA → rotation-based
algorithm: QSVM (quantum kernel)

Output: a downloadable PDF report and reusable code. Total time on a template: under an hour.

Engagement Tracks

Three ways to start, depending on where you are

Whether you're testing a hypothesis or running a regulated benchmark, you can engage with us at the level that matches your stage.

Explore

For whom

Clinical data scientists, biotech R&D, academic researchers

What you get

Self-serve Studio access, Quantum Assistant, 20+ templates

Output

Runnable code + PDF report

Most teams start here

Validate

For whom

R&D teams with a defined clinical problem and data

What you get

4–8 week POC: your data, honest benchmark vs your model, research-grade report

Output

Decision-ready benchmark

Deploy

For whom

Innovation leads, CTOs, heads of clinical AI

What you get

3–6 month pilot: full pipeline, team enablement, QPU runs, integration

Output

Production-ready hybrid module + trained team

Pilot anatomy

What a healthcare POC looks like

Eight weeks from a defined problem to a decision-ready benchmark. No black box, no vendor lock-in.

W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
W7
W8
Week 1–201

Scoping

We review your clinical problem, your data, and your current model. We agree on a measurable success criterion together — accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, ROC-AUC, or robustness under a specific data regime.

Week 3–602

Build & benchmark

We map your problem to one or more quantum or hybrid approaches, run them in Studio, and compare against your classical baseline on your data.

Week 7–803

Decision-ready report

You receive a research-grade PDF: methods, results, honest scaling outlook, and a clear recommendation on whether this problem class is worth deploying further. Plus the runnable code.

We don't promise quantum advantage on every problem. The point of a pilot is to honestly find out whether your problem falls into the zone where quantum or hybrid methods give a measurable edge.
FAQ

Common questions from healthcare teams

No. The Quantum Assistant guides you through every step — describing your problem, picking an algorithm, running it, reading results. You stay in your clinical domain language.

Test quantum on your healthcare problem

Logo

Open-source library, end-to-end platform, and enterprise services for applied quantum computing.

info@superpositions.studio

Studio

OverviewPricingFeatures

Careers

© 2026 Superpositions Studio. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy