
We use a classical SVM pipeline to solve multi-class classification problem. The model seeks a set of separating hyperplanes in feature space, \mathbf{w}^\top \phi(\mathbf{x}) + b = 0 , maximizing the geometric margin between classes. When linear separation is difficult, we map data to a higher-dimensional space and apply the kernel trick: instead of building \phi(\cdot) explicitly, we compute inner products k(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}')=\langle \phi(\mathbf{x}), \phi(\mathbf{x}')\rangle , which lets the SVM operate implicitly in a Hilbert space \mathcal{H}.
Quantum SVM is implemented using a quantum kernel, where input \mathbf{x} is encoded into a quantum state |\phi(\mathbf{x})\rangle=U(\mathbf{x})|0\rangle^{\otimes n} and using the state overlap (inner product or fidelity) as k(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}'). The circuit induces a (potentially very high-dimensional) nonlinear embedding through data-dependent single-qubit rotations and entangling gates; the choice of encoding and entanglement pattern governs which higher-order interactions are represented. These overlaps are estimated by running U(\mathbf{x}')^\dagger U(\mathbf{x}) on quantum hardware; the resulting Gram matrix feeds directly into the standard SVM pipeline.
Task: An industrial quality-control dataset with features describing geometric/photometric properties of steel surfaces (1,941 samples, 27 features; 7 classes). Classification task is to assign each sample to its defect type: Pastry, Z_Scratch, K_Scratch, Stains, Dirtiness, Bumps, Other_Faults.
Execution
Simulator
Number of qubits
4
Number of layers
2
63%
Accuracy
75%
Balanced Accuracy
0.62
Macro F1
The QSVM model potentially speeds up detection of surface-defect types. In production, earlier and more consistent defect identification reduces scrap/rework and shortens engineer reviews.
Annual projected savings from reduced reviews/scrap and faster throughput.
Return on investment based on value add vs. TCO.
Efficiency gains vs. baseline review/inspection workflows.
Simple and transparent: from your brief to quantum results, code, and a paper
Map your problem to the right quantum use case
Confirm the quantum-classical hybrid approach and key assumptions
Download ready-to-run code; execute on simulator
Review reproducible results — iterate as needed
Compare against classical baseline; prepare for quantum hardware
Run your first industrial task with QSVM and get transparent results within a clear report.
Try Your First Use Case for Free