Quantum scheduling optimization visualization
    Quantum Support Vector Machine

    Solve multi-class classification with Quantum Support Vector MachineTransparent, Reproducible Results

    Detect melt-pool defects earlier and reduce scrap.

    What you get: Quantum support vector machine solution for industrial quality — additive manufacturing process monitoring

    How it's delivered: downloadable research-style report and run-ready Python code

    Why trust it: seed-controlled reproducibility, classical baselines, and hardware notes

    Detect Industrial Defects with Your Data

    Multi-class Classification Solution

    We use a classical SVM pipeline to solve multi-class classification problem. The model seeks a set of separating hyperplanes in feature space, \mathbf{w}^\top \phi(\mathbf{x}) + b = 0 , maximizing the geometric margin between classes. When linear separation is difficult, we map data to a higher-dimensional space and apply the kernel trick: instead of building \phi(\cdot) explicitly, we compute inner products k(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}')=\langle \phi(\mathbf{x}), \phi(\mathbf{x}')\rangle , which lets the SVM operate implicitly in a Hilbert space \mathcal{H}.

    What you get on the platform
    • • End-to-end quantum support vector machine executed on simulator
    • • Results: QSVM achieved 63% accuracy and 65% balanced accuracy on a 4-class dataset
    • • Downloadable, citable report (method, experiments, results)
    • • Executable Python code with deterministic, reproducible outputs
    • • Hardware details: encoding, circuit depth/qubits, backend/cost guidance
    • • Baseline comparisons with metrics and plots

    Quantum Support Vector Machine

    Quantum SVM is implemented using a quantum kernel, where input \mathbf{x} is encoded into a quantum state |\phi(\mathbf{x})\rangle=U(\mathbf{x})|0\rangle^{\otimes n} and using the state overlap (inner product or fidelity) as k(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}'). The circuit induces a (potentially very high-dimensional) nonlinear embedding through data-dependent single-qubit rotations and entangling gates; the choice of encoding and entanglement pattern governs which higher-order interactions are represented. These overlaps are estimated by running U(\mathbf{x}')^\dagger U(\mathbf{x}) on quantum hardware; the resulting Gram matrix feeds directly into the standard SVM pipeline.

    Strengths

    • Quantum kernels embed data into high-dimensional Hilbert spaces, increasing the chance of linear separability and improving classification quality.
    • Shallow, hardware-efficient circuits keep depth, noise, and runtime low enough for practical kernel evaluation on NISQ devices.
    • On fault-tolerant quantum hardware, kernel entries over exponentially large state spaces can be estimated in polynomial quantum time for specific problem families.

    Weaknesses

    • Contemporary quantum devices exhibit non-negligible noise and gate/measurement error rates, which can degrade model or task-level accuracy.
    • Performance improvements over classical baselines are not guaranteed and typically depend on the dataset, problem structure, and parameter regime.
    • Classical simulation of quantum circuits can avoid hardware noise but incurs additional computational cost compared to purely classical approaches.

    Proof-of-Concept Simulation Results

    Task: A metal additive-manufacturing dataset for classifying melt-pool modes across different metals during electron beam powder bed fusion and laser powder bed fusion. Each sample is assigned to one of four classes: "LOF", "balling", "desirable", or "keyhole". The dataset contains 1,242 samples with 35 features each.

    Execution

    Simulator

    Number of qubits

    4

    Number of layers

    2

    Key Outcomes

    63%

    Accuracy

    65%

    Balanced Accuracy

    0.63

    Macro F1

    Business Impact

    The QSVM classifier potentially speeds up real-time detection of melt-pool regimes and flags unstable variants earlier, reducing scrap/rework and engineering review time.

    Cost Savings

    $80,000

    Annual projected savings from reduced reviews/scrap and faster throughput.

    ROI

    167%

    Return on investment based on value add vs. TCO.

    Time Saved

    35%

    Efficiency gains vs. baseline review/inspection workflows.

    How it works

    Simple and transparent: from your brief to quantum results, code, and a paper

    01

    Describe

    Map your problem to the right quantum use case

    02

    Confirm

    Confirm the quantum-classical hybrid approach and key assumptions

    03

    Run

    Download ready-to-run code; execute on simulator with a fized seed

    04

    Review

    Review reproducible results — iterate as needed

    05

    Benchmark

    Compare against classical baseline; prepare for quantum hardware

    Run QSVM Now

    Run your first additive manufacturing task with QSVM and get transparent results within a clear report.

    Try Your First Use Case for Free